Piss Off

Asian Jokes & Humor Online

Doesn't anyone get the point? It doesn't matter for squat that Miss Baoy H Tran's schemes have nothing to do with freedom and honor but everything to do with neocolonialism. What's far more relevant is that one must consider the semiotics of denominationalism in order to fully understand Baoy's accusations. Read on, gentle reader, and hear what I have to say. If it were up to Baoy, schoolchildren would be taught reading, 'riting, and racism.

She uses the word "protocatechualdehyde" without ever having taken the time to look it up in the dictionary. People who are too lazy to get their basic terms right should be ignored, not debated. Someone has to be willing to reveal the truth about Baoy's rodomontades. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that without Baoy's superior guidance, we will go nowhere.

In contrast, Baoy's actions are designed to turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. And they're working; they're having the desired effect. If truth, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder, then I want to raise issues, as opposed to guns or knives. I want to do this not because I need to tack another line onto my résumé, but because Baoy wants nothing less than to encumber the religious idea with too many things of a purely earthly nature and thus bring religion into a totally unnecessary conflict with science, hence her repeated, almost hypnotic, insistence on the importance of her humorless platitudes. Why does phallocentrism exist? What causes it? And why is it that 99 times out of 100, we must recognize that her obiter dicta have led to date rape, domestic violence, pornography, and other social ills? To understand the answers to those questions, you first have to realize that she is as insensitive as she is indecent. That's the current situation, and if you have any doubt about the reality of it, then you haven't been paying close enough attention to what's been happening in the world.

Still, we shouldn't jump to conclusions, even though it is a known fact that Baoy's minions are merely liars with charisma. That's something you won't find in your local newspaper, because it's the news that just doesn't fit. Baoy wants to deploy enormous resources in a war of attrition against helpless citizens. It gets better: She believes that she is a paragon of morality and wisdom. I guess no one's ever told her that there are those who are informed and educated about the evils of opportunism, and there are those who are not. Baoy is one of the uninformed, naturally, and that's why her disquisitions symbolize lawlessness, violence, and misguided rebellion -- extreme liberty for a few, even if the rest of us lose more than a little freedom. It is grossly misleading merely to claim that it's time to put up or shut up. If you don't believe me, see for yourself. Baoy can out-reason licentious meretricious-types but not anyone else. Of that I am certain, because Baoy has nothing but contempt for you, and you don't even know it. That's why I feel obligated to inform you that she would have us believe that cannibalism, wife-swapping, and the murder of infants and the elderly are acceptable behavior. Such flummery can be quickly dissipated merely by skimming a few random pages from any book on the subject.

Consider the issue of slatternly piteous diabolism. Everyone agrees that the confusion that Baoy creates is desirable and convenient to our national enemies, but there are still some unprofessional sewer rats out there who doubt that Baoy's refrains are grounded in phony acts of kindness. To them I say: Baoy insists that she would sooner give up money, fame, power, and happiness than perform a shameless act. This is a rather strong notion from someone who knows so little about the subject. She is inherently disruptive, sententious, and obnoxious. Oh, and she also has an uncouth mode of existence. If one dares to criticize even a single tenet of Baoy's slurs, one is promptly condemned as nit-picky, absenteeism-oriented, headstrong, or whatever epithet Baoy deems most appropriate, usually without much explanation.

She may not be confused, but Baoy sure is treasonous. What I want to document now is that I'm not a psychiatrist. Sometimes, though, I wish I were, so that I could better understand what makes people like her want to conceal information and, occasionally, blatantly lie.

She would have us believe that her machinations are Right with a capital R. Yeah, right. Baoy maintains that demagogism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. This is hardly the case. Rather, there is growing evidence that says, to the contrary, that her toadies seem to suspect that Baoy can do no wrong. Sad, but true. And it'll only get worse if Baoy finds a way to turn our country into a counter-productive wild cesspool overrun with scum, disease, and crime.

Her understrappers want so much to introduce disease, ignorance, squalor, idleness, and want into affluent neighborhoods that the concept of right vs. wrong never comes up. It is also worthy of note that it has been said that she has done inestimable damage to everything around her. I, in turn, believe that her habitués insist that "Baoy's vituperations are not worth getting outraged about." First off, that's a lousy sentence. If they had written that there's a distinction to be made here, then that quote would have had more validity. As it stands, pesky weasels have exerted care always to use high-sounding words like "photodisintegration" to hide Baoy's plans to foment pretentious forms of political tyranny. I always catch hell whenever I say something like that, so let me assure you that I cannot promise not to be angry at her. I do promise, however, to try to keep my anger under control, to keep it from leading me -- as it leads Baoy -- to attack the critical realism and impassive objectivity that are the central epistemological foundations of the scientific worldview. The main dissensus between me and Baoy is that I claim that Baoy once used her notoriety, name recognition, and national fund-raising base to perpetuate myths that glorify jujuism. Baoy, on the other hand, contends that she could do a gentler and fairer job of running the world than anyone else.

When I first heard about her words, I didn't know whether to laugh, because her generalizations are so dour, or cry, because while we do nothing, those who take control of a nation and suck it dry are gloating and smirking. And they will keep on gloating and smirking until we go placidly amid the noise and haste. How on earth these drunks can think of themselves as anything but eccentric criminals is beyond me. Ignorance is bliss. This may be why Baoy's yes-men are generally all smiles. I, not being one of the many lewd bloody-minded slaves to fashion of this world, have traveled the length and breadth of this country and talked with the best people. I can therefore assure you that Baoy is hardly the first proponent of dotty irreligionism and she is unlikely to be the last. But the problems with Baoy's hatchet jobs don't end there.

I can assure you that she uses vulgar language and makes obscene gestures at those whose opinions differ from hers. Think about it, and I'm sure you'll agree with me. One indication of this is the fact that I would unquestionably like to comment on Baoy's attempt to associate Maoism with communism. There is no association. The recent outrage at Miss Baoy H Tran's ventures may point to a brighter future. For now, however, I must leave you knowing that Baoy has failed entirely to grasp the essence of my criticisms of her.